In this paper, we investigate whether, and to what extent, UK newspapers exhibited image-based bias in their portrayal of politicians during the 2016 Brexit referendum. We use computer vision and machine learning techniques to first, identify the faces of politicians and assess the emotional content conveyed through their expressions and second, to measure the contextual sentiment of the overall image, including elements such as background, objects, and color. Our findings reveal that tabloid newspapers displayed significant partisan bias. Specifically, pro-leave tabloids were more likely to depict pro-leave politicians with positive facial expressions and in more favorable visual contexts, while pro-remain politicians were portrayed more negatively. This bias was especially pronounced in front-page images and those featuring key political figures, while no comparable patterns were found in broadsheets. However, the visual bias diminished immediately after the referendum vote. Our scalable framework not only provides a systematic way to detect visual bias in political imagery but also underscores the growing need for media accountability and visual literacy as images play an increasingly powerful role in shaping political communication.
Related Posts
-
Combatting Fraud in Online Surveys: What To Do When Your Respondents Aren’t Real
-
Human-in-the-Loop Digital Twins: How Real-Time Biosensor Data Is Transforming Simulator Research
-
Digital Twins in Consumer Research: Validating Synthetic Behavior with Biosensors
-
Forensic Science: Leveraging Human Behavior Research to Go Beyond the Crime Scene
