Enhancing Imaging Anatomy Competency: Integrating Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Viewers Into the Anatomy Lab Experience

Luke Worley

Maria A. Colley

Caroline C. Rodriguez

David Redden

Drew Logullo

William Pearson

Introduction: Radiologic interpretation is a skill necessary for all physicians to provide quality care for their patients. However, some medical students are not exposed to Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) imaging manipulation until their third year during clinical rotations. The objective of this study is to evaluate how medical students exposed to DICOM manipulation perform on identifying anatomical structures compared to students who were not exposed.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional cohort study with 19 medical student participants organized into a test and control group. The test group consisted of first-year students who had been exposed to a new imaging anatomy curriculum (n = 9). The control group consisted of second-year students who had not had this experience (n = 10). The outcomes measured included quiz performance, self-reported confidence levels, and eye-tracking data.

Results: Students in the test group performed better on the quiz compared to students in the control group (p = 0.03). Confidence between the test and control groups was not significantly different (p = 0.16), though a moderate to large effect size difference was noted (Hedges’ g = 0.75). Saccade peak velocity and fixation duration between the groups were not significantly different (p = 0.29, p = 0.77), though a moderate effect size improvement was noted in saccade peak velocity for the test group (Hedges’ g = 0.49).

Conclusion: The results from this study suggest that the early introduction of DICOM imaging into a medical school curriculum does impact students’ performance when asked to identify anatomical structures on a standardized quiz.

This publication uses Eye Tracking and Eye Tracking Screen Based which is fully integrated into iMotions Lab

Learn more