Biosensor research may be defined as a method of investigating the subconscious signals from the body, to reveal otherwise hidden features related to emotion, attention, cognition and physiological arousal.
Biosensor research uses sensors that are designed to measure and record various signals that our body produces, from our facial expressions and eye movements, to our heart rate, brain signals, and more.
- Why Multi-Sensor Research?
- Traditional Research Methods
- Biosensor Research Methods
- Web-Based vs. Lab-Based Research
We subconsciously produce these signals all the time. When we look at a stimulus, such as an image or an advertisement, for example, our eyes focus on various features and our facial expression may change. Additionally, electrical activity generated across our skin adjusts in response, and brain activity might be altered. All of these signals tell a deep story about the physiological response to the stimulus and can be measured with biosensors.
A stimulus refers to anything that leads to a sensory or behavioral response in an organism. In a research context, any material or object shown to a participant is considered a stimulus. It can be an image, a video, a fragrance, a musical piece, etcetera.
Traditional methods that have long been used to investigate human behavior have focused on a question-answer approach (be it with surveys, questionnaires, or through simple observation). While this approach may generate a great amount of insight, it may at times lack the quantitative and objective data necessary to support or refute the claims made.
There are a variety of reasons why the question-answer approach has its drawbacks. Such methods are prone to biases, with respondents unwilling or unable to speak their minds. Even when respondents attempt to be fully open and honest, there are subconscious biases and a variety of other factors at play that may alter their response. By providing a method to measure the subconscious thoughts and feelings of a respondent, these factors can be quantified, compared, and utilized to make conclusions that can support or refute the original hypotheses. Each biosensor provides a different and collaborative element in that understanding.
Many factors can influence human behavior, and these factors create uncertainty, or variability, in how people will act. The goal of multimodal research is to explain as much of that variability as possible.
If we think of variability as a pie, we want to carve out the largest, non-overlapping slices that we can. To do this, we use biosensors and traditional methods (such as surveys and focus groups) to complement one another to understand as much of that “pie” as possible.
Each slice below represents some percentage of variability that can be explained by each research method. The numbers shown are hypothetical examples of how much non-overlapping variance each methodology could explain.
Traditional methods and biosensor methods can complement each other by answering different types of questions about the psychological and physiological journey of an individual in relation to a certain stimulus or experience. Traditional methods can answer questions like:
Why do people believe they respond to certain stimuli, and not others?
Why do people believe they prefer one stimulus over the other?
What do people consciously remember from an experience?
While these traditional methods can provide subjective reports of an experience, biosensor methods add a level of objectivity to researchers’ analyses. With biosensor measures, one
can gain insight into curiosities such as:
What do people have cognitive-emotional reactions to? How intense are those responses?
How frequently do those responses occur?
What gets overtly noticed, and what gets ignored or goes missed?
What are the underlying biological mechanisms that can drive behaviors?
Below is a list of advantages and considerations associated with each different type of human behavior research methodology.
Includes survey, focus groups, and interview methodologies
Includes physiological, biological, and other non-verbal measures
- Ecological validity is the degree to which a study’s findings are generalizable to natural life settings.
- Reverse inference is a logical fallacy made when interpreting brain imaging data.
Over the past few decades, survey-based research has increasingly moved from in-person to online administration for reasons of cost and audience reach.
In turn, there is increasing demand for online biosensor solutions to pair with such methodologies, such as web-based eye tracking and facial expression analysis. However, there are some critical trade-offs between online- and lab-based biosensor research:
The iMotions platform is optimized for lab-based research. Some limitations to web-based research include a lack of control over data quality and the inability to collect certain data streams using just the equipment participants have available to them at home. For example, current web-based eye tracking solutions such as using the built-in laptop webcam are not as reliable or accurate as ET collected with infrared camera technology.
However, technology is increasingly shifting to accommodate these limitations and support web-based biosensor research. One very effective option for remote research is facial expression analysis. iMotions integrates Affectiva’s engine, AFFDEX, which unobtrusively measures unfiltered and unbiased facial expressions of emotion, using just a standard webcam.
This solution allows researchers not only to analyze facial expressions in real-time but also to analyze videos after-the-fact by post-processing facial expression data.
Another option for remote research is behavioral coding. Behavioral coding is defined as a set of methodical, standardized, quantifiable observations about a participant. Combined with biosensor data and self-report, behavior insights gleaned from this process provide a comprehensive analysis for your research.
How Multi-sensors complement research
A common question that arises when researchers inquire about biosensor research is, “Can biosensors do a better job of measuring human behavior than my current research methods?” However, this is the wrong question to be considering when thinking about adding biosensors to your research.
Instead, consider asking, “What new questions can I answer with biosensors?” Rather than thinking of biosensors as a replacement for our current research methods, it is important to reframe our thinking to view biosensors as a complement to our traditional methods.
Biosensors can add an additional layer of granularity by allowing us to ask new questions and take our research a step further. If you are interested in learning more about multi-sensor testing or specific biosensors for your research, please check out our blogs below, or contact us for more information.
|Download our free brochure|
Learn more about Multi-Sensor